CNN legal analyst says prosecution ‘fell way short’ of proving case against Trump

CNN legal analyst Randy Zelin told host Kate Bolduan the prosecution in former President Donald Trump’s case in New York City was far from proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he was directly involved in paying off Stormy Daniels.

Both the defense and prosecution gave their closing arguments on Tuesday after the weeks-long trial that has limited Trump’s ability to actively campaign in the 2024 election.

“The burden of proof is an important one to remind everyone: It’s on the prosecution, right? They need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he commit — that Donald Trump broke the law. And you think after listening to all of this, you think they fell short. How?” Bolduan asked Zelin.

‘It’s simply about: Did the former president know that books, his records, false entries for legal fees, Michael Cohen was his lawyer …’

“They fell way short because let’s start with…

Read more…

spot_imgspot_img

Latest news

Related news

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here